yea but we do need to vote someoneI don't really have a scumread on anyone, but I don't think there's enough evidence on Evie to confidently say they're anarchist or fascist, so I do think voting to lynch them here is a mistake.
yea but we do need to vote someoneI don't really have a scumread on anyone, but I don't think there's enough evidence on Evie to confidently say they're anarchist or fascist, so I do think voting to lynch them here is a mistake.
Policies get revealed at the end of the day. The intent is for the policy choices to inform next day's execution vote.So when do the policies get revealed then? Is it not the intent for the Chancellor's policy choices to inform the execution vote?
That was not clear from the reading of the rules where there is 24h for "Legislation+Policy Selection" and then 24h for a vote after that, but okay. I was at least a little bit waiting to see what would happen with that to vote and just got back from work lol.Policies get revealed at the end of the day. The intent is for the policy choices to inform next day's execution vote.
Yes to the first, the second is a holdover, sorry - you need to kill all Fascists to win.Are the anarchists capped at 1 recruit? If so that's a relief and I do think the math on both an execution today and a legislation victory get a lot better.
Do we only need to kill one scum to win? Because it says we win if Hitler dies or all Fascists die.
Yes, No Vote is a valid option in this game.Are we even allowed to vote for no execution?
lol you should reallly start thinking at some point just sayingOh wait the rules got edited to remove the Hitler dies condition I'm going crazy
des out here committing murderlol you should reallly start thinking at some point just saying
thats not murder thou he should think at some pointdes out here committing murder
I know, right? God damn I'm out here living my life and I just got burneddes out here committing murder
sorryI know, right? God damn I'm out here living my life and I just got burned
its my first time playing, its a bit hard to add anything of substance when i dont really know whats going onmorning des!
tbh when evie responded immediately to catching a vote i thought we were getting something of substance so. poke poke please speak up
Vote: Evie
Yea because some people have different time zonesAlr seems like everyone is mostly alive late night/early morning so ig il check back in like 6 hours or smth
Is it a scumsided setup? Honestly not the easiest one to digest. If there really is no NK itll come down to legislation potentially?idk. maybe im reading the setup wrong but in what feels like a scum-sided setup i feel like scum benefits from a sleepy thread and avoiding too much game progress especially on d1
Hitler becoming chancellor is a wincon after a certain threshold of legislation has been reached, right? Like CK said, if there are PRs we can moreorless guarantee they aren't Hitler.This feels incorrect. As the rules state that there is an increased chance of fascist legislation as opposed to liberal legislation, in addition to the fact that letting the Fascists sit in the President's chair allows for them to throw out the occasional liberal policy, I think sitting around and not lynching anyone will just result in a slower win for the fascists. We should ideally be trying to identify and eliminate them because the setup is absolutely mafiasided. Not to mention there is an incredibly high risk of Hitler being nominated chancellor if we keep passing an approximately equal amount of Liberal and Fascists policies without any lynchings. I don't necessarily think every vote needs to be one, but stalling them all out seems suboptimal for town.