• Snag some vintage SPL team logo merch over at our Teespring store before January 12th!

FEDS VS SMUGGLERS - GAME OVER, FED VICTORY

@my team

the people who did this last cycle (6)

the two people who succeeded in searching (2x people targeted same), please target MY (JALMONT)'s target this cycle so we can maximize what we are doing.

target the same person you targeted on cycle 5. we are submitting for cycle 7 now.

the other person I searched with, let's target the same user you targeted cycle 1
Btw this is cycle 8 right? lol just realised
 
smugglers should not let scum coordinate in thread and quickhammer

vote pulsar


1. a fairy
2. shadowpea
3. des121 (aka des)
4. @batMAN (aka dbd / dead by daylight)
5. CrreamyKitty (aka ck)
6. Celever (aka cele)
7. Duskfall98 (aka tommy)
8. apricity (aka hal)
9. realiti
10. skippergamez (aka skip)
11. bluedoom
12. pulsar512b (now apparently dashcon ballpit)
13. ImaginaryNeon (aka neon)
14. camryn (aka cabbate) AligningStar JALMONT


please vote pulsar immediately to quickhammer and give scum let time to coordinate
 
cool so i assume based on last round and this round that the feds are targeting people who have not yet held the goods (since the fact that a player who has not held the goods before this round got the goods and they are not changing strats)

so this round give more emphasis on people who have already had the goods before: pea, ck, realiti, skip

i'll leave it to y'all to decide the appropriate weighting -- maybe something like 75% of the time one of these four, 25% not?

enjoy
 
ImaginaryNeon Duskfall98 Dead by Daylight
No it’s not

Imo just submit same again
actually this is incorrect we absolutely should swap. fuck i deleted my notes lol

if i am calculating correct we have a 66% chance of seizing the goods given that we know the group it is within

tbh i think it's almost worth just talking out loud and hoping for the best since whoever has the goods can't do anything about it. this way there's no confusion and we maximize our seizes. the problem then becomes if we target 2 people who don't have the goods it is very easy to pass to the person not being checked which is very bad.

the alternative is i try and think of a code. i think that's probably for the best. we can also discuss out loud but use code to communicate our targets
 
Back
Top