agree with every point, i personally really like using it and honestly would be opposed to it leaving, feels spammable but not oppressive and god mus are few and far between
The only mon in the tier which had a winrate statistically significantly above 50%. In my eyes, it is by far the strongest mon in the tier. It has some very individually strong sets (scarf, kee, leftovers), and has some room for tech like resist berries, specs, helmet, etc. The best part about Cress is that as the cress user, your matchups are often extremely linear. Like glitched said there isn't much you can do to tech for Cress (outside of very very specific matchups, like healer aromatisse vs skill swap cress), so you can avoid a lot of the cheese which is present in the tier by midground picking cress.
Even though it is very strong, I do not think Cress warrants a ban. It is pretty easy to setguess on preview. Trying to slot in moves like moonblast, skill swap, and substitute is difficult, and its usually easy to spot these techs.
i think the reason its presence as a warping builder threat has gone unnoticed is because its just too hard to use teams that lose to drago, the presence of drago on anyones usage instantly gatekeeps certain mons at risk of making previews incredibly linear and arguably luck based, but like whatever we can let it go its been years. i just think its objectively bad for the tier and a fairly uninteractive pokemon in what is otherwise an incredibly interactive metagame
I strongly oppose any tiering action taken on this mon. If you look through the top 10 mons in usage, I would consider 8 of them to have viable sets which "beat" regidrago (all prim/fini/azu, most steela/meta, skill swap lefties cress, custap shifu-s, av landot). Beat is in quotation marks because nothing beats anything in ss - that's just part of the tier's identity and I don't think drago is particularly opressive in that regard.
I genuinely don't understand why people have a problem with regidrago. In order to "beat" cresselia with a mon in the top 10 usage, I would say you're limited to scarf fini, scarf meta, most volcarona, and max attack AV / roseli urshifu-s. Regidrago struggles against most steel and fairy types (two inherently good typings, even when not accounting for regidrago), while I personally view Cresselia as the reason why bug and dark types are ran at all. I don't know why people cite regidrago as limiting team compostions. There are so many splashable regidrago answers that I never have to think about it when building, and its reputation as a 2-1 machine is dubious.
I do not think drago adds anything positive to the tier but that is not grounds for a ban. It is not uncompetitive, it is not broken, and it is not overly centralizing.
agree w all this yawn is super ridiculous. sylv is literally top 5 with optimal yawn turns and even with just 2 can flip some ludicrous mus, pulling wins out of your ass on 33% chances is frankly uncompetitive and obnoxious and id love to see sleep as a whole go. a bigger discussion on this would be great(sleep) / (acupressure)
In an ideal world I would like to see sleep go. Yawn sylv sleep rolls most of the tier, being able to beat mons like ferro using LO without having to tech in fire moves. Venusaur is fine health wise as a sleep trap but its ability to randomly beat faster mons and abuse custap + sleep powder is annoying. I think yawn sylv is secretly broken but it hasn't been too oppressive in tournaments, so I understand if these problems are not worth the shake up to the tier.
My one major problem with ss tiering is that there are too many decisions that were a knee jerk reaction to some annoying ladderers. I do not understand why accupressure (unusably awful luck based move) was unanimously banned while moves like confuse ray or zap cannon (unusuably awful luck based moves) are allowed. By clicking accupressure, you are using up your turn to roll a 1/7 chance to hit evasion, and then get a 40% chance for the evasion to actually help you dodge. This is a 5.7% chance for the evasion from accupressure to matter. Compare that to stuff like sand veil / snow cloak, which has to a higher chance of evasion mattering, and also actively does some chip damage to your opponent, or moves like thunder wave, which have a much, much higher chance to result in game altering luck. Accupressure is an annoying blemish in the tiering and it would nice for it to be unbanned for consistency, or to see the weather evasion abilities banned alongside it under the umbrella of "evasion effects." Both lead to zero impact on the tier and only serve to make the banlist more consistent.
Pokémon | General | Qualified |
Charizard-Mega-X | 3.4 | 3.8 |
Gardevoir-Mega | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Metagross-Mega | 1.9 | 1.6 |
Victini | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Mew | 2.8 | 2.6 |
Unbanning Blaziken-Mega | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Pokemon | general votes | ''qualified'' voters |
Genesect | 3,4 | 3,56 |
Thundurus | 3,6 | 3,63 |
Snorlax | 3,1 | 3,1 |
Manaphy | 1,9 | 1,8 |
Volcarona | 1,6 | 1,5 |
Cresselia | 1,9 | 1,8 |
Mega Charizard X: [b]Ban[/b]
OR
Mega Charizard X: [b]Do not ban[/b]
Voting is now open you can find the voting post at this link. Do not vote if you're not on the list of qualified voters.Following results of the above tiering survey, the ORAS 1v1 council has decided to suspect test Mega Charizard X
ORAS 1v1 Mega Charizard X Suspect Test
This suspect test will consist of a brief period of metagame discussion on this thread, followed by closed voting by qualified voters. The qualified voters are chosen as follows:
To get the tiering action done in timely fashion so that people can start preparing for the ORAS cup of 1v1 classic, we will not be holding suspect tours for this suspect. While I'm here I want to note future suspect requirements across all old gens are planned to be similar, but may not completly line up with the above as we work on using standardised metrics across all old gen suspects.
- Members of the ORAS 1v1 Council (as Old Gens leader standing in, this does not include me)
- Players who played at least 3 ORAS series in 1v1 PL VIII, and won at least 1 of those series.
- Players who played at least 3 ORAS series in 1v1 OGPL II, and won at least 1 of those series.
With these in place, the voter list is as follows:
Anyone not listed above is still free to chime in for discussion on Mega Charizard X to help inform those who can vote. This discussion period will run until Wednesday September 18th, 18:00 UTC. After this, qualified voters can cast their votes.
- After the above discussion deadline, qualified voters open a Smogon conversation with Felucia
- In this conversation they vote on banning Mega Charizard X, using the following format
Code:Mega Charizard X: [b]Ban[/b] OR Mega Charizard X: [b]Do not ban[/b]
- Only the first vote counts, and voting messages may not be edited. Subsequent votes or edited messages will be ignored
- Mega Charizard X will be banned if a supermajority of 60% pro-ban voters is reached.
- Votes are published after a verdict is reached.
Voting will go through the non-tc blind voting forum