Unpopular opinions

I wonder why people have so much problems with feminine Pokemon designs?

Probably because it gives the internet its lifeblood.

For the record I typically prefer cuter designs with a few exceptions.

But American polls seem to favor only masculine, cool looking mons.

I'm not American but I'd be interested in a link to a poll that says Americans only favor "masculine, cool looking mons." as you have said.
 
I wonder why people have so much problems with feminine Pokemon designs?
Girls play Pokemon too.
Plus, feminine Pokemon are not perceived as better or worse in Japan.
But American polls seem to favor only masculine, cool looking mons.

Seriously, if every Pokemon is the masculine cool looking type, Pokemon would have been really boring.
It's not necessarily that people have a problem in my experience - though I'm sure you will get your DUDEBRO guys who'll detest even the slightest showing of pink - but moreso just that it's a preference. It's simply cultural differences is all.
It's surprisingly similar to - and please note this, stereotypically - what type of body type is preferred or seen as desirable in a male between countries - western countries tend to place emphasis on muscles and strength, while Japan places more emphasis on intelligence and a muscled-up body is seen as more undesirable. I guess this sort of cultural preference difference is just a thing.
Speaking personally, my favourite Pokémon is Klefki and second favourite is Beedrill, so I'm just all over the place.

Playing pokemon competitively is more stressful than fun imo. Honestly don't know why so many people like it, myself included.
I think it's simply the desire to win; the rush of adrenaline as you're in a tight space and the good feeling you may get when you succeed. Working hard for a reward, basically.
 
Probably because it gives the internet its lifeblood.

For the record I typically prefer cuter designs with a few exceptions.



I'm not American but I'd be interested in a link to a poll that says Americans only favor "masculine, cool looking mons." as you have said.
Dorkly poll though.
http://www.dorkly.com/toplist/56974/the-greatest-pokemon-of-all-time-vote-now

Largest ever English language vote, most voters Americans.
Very boring results of all masculine Pokemon.
 
Dorkly poll though.
http://www.dorkly.com/toplist/56974/the-greatest-pokemon-of-all-time-vote-now

Largest ever English language vote, most voters Americans.
Very boring results of all masculine Pokemon.
I've always thought stuff like Gardevoir would top popularity polls because of, you know... reasons, but it doesn't really surprise me. I think it has more to do with the fact of how 'epic' most of them look as opposed to whether they look masculine or not. Sun & Moon respective mascots for example: Solgaleo looks all majestic and epic af, whereas Lunalaa seems to be more graceful & gentler ( imo atleast ). While I do think that they're both excellent in their own right, the 'epicness' of it makes Solgaleo stand out more for me. It's probably just a western culture thing: the braver and stronger something looks/is, the more memorable it is, and those in our culture are generally male figures.

I also can't see the results of that poll btw, so I'm just taking your word for it.
 
I've always thought stuff like Gardevoir would top popularity polls because of, you know... reasons, but it doesn't really surprise me. I think it has more to do with the fact of how 'epic' most of them look as opposed to whether they look masculine or not. Sun & Moon respective mascots for example: Solgaleo looks all majestic and epic af, whereas Lunalaa seems to be more graceful & gentler ( imo atleast ). While I do think that they're both excellent in their own right, the 'epicness' of it makes Solgaleo stand out more for me. I think it's just a western culture thing: the braver and stronger something looks/is, the more memorable it is, and those in our culture are generally male figures.

I also can't see the results of that poll btw, so I'm just taking your word for it.
It used to work.
Anyway, here's another link
http://www.dorkly.com/post/57679/toplist-results-the-25-greatest-pokemon-of-all-time
 
Sun & Moon respective mascots for example: Solgaleo looks all majestic and epic af, whereas Lunalaa seems to be more graceful & gentler ( imo atleast ). While I do think that they're both excellent in their own right, the 'epicness' of it makes Solgaleo stand out more for me..

#TeamLunaala

Very boring results of all masculine Pokemon.

Well I mean at least Mew is #4


The top 5 are also all Gen I Pokemon, which is far more of a shame if you ask me. Still, I don't know who visits Dorkly but I don't really imagine it to be representative of the average Pokemon player today.

(I mean this also annoys me because Charizard is #1 and I hate it but w/e)
 
Gen VI is one of the worsts in terms of Pokemon designs. Most of the evolved forms of the mons were incredibly disappointing to me and could not live up to their pre-evos at all, including but not limited to: Gourgeist, Trevenant, Pangoro, Tyrantrum, Noivern, Malamar, Flabébé, Slurpuff, Aromatisse etc. It alsmot feels like a reverse Gen III of sorts in that I didn't really care about most of the mons' pre-evos, but they did really well with the evolved forms (Baltoy, Lotad, Numel, Cacnea, Seedot, Trapinch, Barboach etc).

The starters were also pretty bad, including Greninja. They just don't do anything for me at all and can't compare with Gens I, III and IV in that regard. Greninja in particular is really overrated. The legends besides Yveltal/Xerneas were all pretty meh too.

I also don't like it that they made Goodra only Dragon. It just makes it really bland in comparison to the other pseudo-legends, and they've completely failed to make him a great Pokemon in it's debuting Generation like they did with the all of the other ones, which really sucked and made it so forgettable, unfortunately. It's still one of my faves design-wise with Dnite and Ttar tho.

I don't really hate Gen VI as a whole, but I feel like it's kinda overrated sometimes, especially when it comes to Pokemon designs.
 
I wouldn't necessarily say that those are masculine other than Blaziken (would Lucario and Alakazam count? Aren't they also really popular in eastern countries?) if we're defining masculine as Machamp and friends (and I assume we are since we've defined feminine as Gardevoir). I think America's tastes represent western culture's idea of a hero. Western culture tends to have more of an emphasis on strength than other cultures. I mean, yes it does value wisdom, but that's more of an afterthought. Looking at the Marvel comics, Doctor Strange, Wasp, Cyclops, and Jean Gray some of the few heroes that didn't have strength as a super power. Even unconventional ones like the Human Torch and Invisible Girl beat major villains in hand-to-hand combat (SandMan and Dr. Doom respectively). Iron Man's main power originally was that his suit had super strength, and AntMan was quickly replaced by GiantMan sacrificing tactics for brute strength. I don't know much about DC, but their big three are SuperMan, WonderWoman, and BatMan. Even with their whole slew of options, their fights usually end with a swift punch to the face. Physical sports like wrestling and American football (well I guess this is obviously just popular in the US) seem to be much more popular in the west than anywhere else (actually correct me if I'm wrong on this. I'm not really aware of what sports most countries are fans of). Western culture just seems to prefer brute strength to wisdom while eastern culture is the other way around.
 
Gen VI is one of the worsts in terms of Pokemon designs. Most of the evolved forms of the mons were incredibly disappointing to me and could not live up to their pre-evos at all, including but not limited to: Gourgeist, Trevenant, Pangoro, Tyrantrum, Noivern, Malamar, Flabébé, Slurpuff, Aromatisse etc. It alsmot feels like a reverse Gen III of sorts in that I didn't really care about most of the mons' pre-evos, but they did really well with the evolved forms (Baltoy, Lotad, Numel, Cacnea, Seedot, Trapinch, Barboach etc).

Not going to deny this but Noivern is pretty cool imo.

The starters were also pretty bad, including Greninja. They just don't do anything for me at all and can't compare with Gens I, III and IV in that regard. Greninja in particular is really overrated. The legends besides Yveltal/Xerneas were all pretty meh too.

A lot of starters are overrated (Charizard, Blaziken etc). I personally dislike Greninja the most, not because of its design but of how highly people talk about what's just a "meh" Pokemon imo. As for the legends, I like them bar Volcanion but what's confused me is why only three are available in game without an event when other generations have more of this. Also if Volcanion / Diancie / Hoopa is supposed to the legendary trio of Gen VI why are all three locked away in events.

I really dislike how the Gen I trio where used as the roaming legendaries but that's not unpopular. I would rather have the roaming legends function like they have in the previous games. Not sure if that's popular or not though.

I also don't like it that they made Goodra only Dragon.

Dragalge, Noivern, Tyrantrum and Zygarde also have the Dragon Type.

EDIT: Read this wrong oops
 
Last edited:
I think they mean how Goodra isn't dual-typed.

Ah, my bad. I can see that now. In that case...

I don't really mind this because if anything I wouldn't want another Dragon / Flying pseudo because that's been done over and over. However given that this is the same gen that introduced the Fairy Type, a Dragon / Fairy Type would have been quite neat.
 
Last edited:
Ah, my bad. I can see that now. In that case...

I don't really mind this because if anything I wouldn't want another Dragon / Flying pseudo because that's been done over and over. However given that this is the same gen that introduced the Fairy Type, a Dragon / Fairy Type would have been quite neat.

Why would Goodra have been part Flying...?
 
I agree in that those way too common dual-type combinations end up being boring. I mean, Goodra not being dual-typed was actually a relief.

That being said, there has only been one Dragon/Flying (Or Flying/Dragon in that case) Pokemon since Gen IV (That I remember of, disregarding Mega Rayquaza), which is something at least, and we've had a good number of unique typings.
 
I personally love how Goodra is pure-Dragon. It's not something we see often enough and sometimes, a monotype 'mon is a good thing. I mean, Goodra wouldn't fit on my team as perfectly if it was dual typed.
 
Besides, we all know that if Goodra was somehow Fairy/Dragon or Bug/Dragon, we would attack Nintendo for "forcing an extra type on a perfectly fine mono-dragon."
I think that the only additional types that might have had a chance of making sense on Goodra would be Ground or Water, and if that happened we would all get made at Nintendo anyway.
 
Besides, we all know that if Goodra was somehow Fairy/Dragon or Bug/Dragon, we would attack Nintendo for "forcing an extra type on a perfectly fine mono-dragon."
I think that the only additional types that might have had a chance of making sense on Goodra would be Ground or Water, and if that happened we would all get made at Nintendo anyway.

I think Water/Dragon could have been fine. I mean, it already relies on rain to evolve, and has Hydration...
 
I'm okay with the mono-Dragon typing on Goodra, since we have very few fully-evolved Pokémon of that mono-typing, such as Haxorus and Druddigon. Goodra looks friendlier than a stereotypical swamp monster, anyway.
 
Besides, we all know that if Goodra was somehow Fairy/Dragon or Bug/Dragon, we would attack Nintendo for "forcing an extra type on a perfectly fine mono-dragon."
I think that the only additional types that might have had a chance of making sense on Goodra would be Ground or Water, and if that happened we would all get made at Nintendo anyway.

Excuse me what's wrong with putting a new type on a new Pokemon, both in the same generation. I honestly feel you would get mad because I know a lot of people who would agree with this.
 
I was trying to capture ho-oh in ORAS when all my pokemon wiped put and I noticed something that I didn't agree with. Why did I have to drop 6000 poke dollars whilst I left? This is stupid! It's not like the Ho-oh is gonna pick it up in its wings or talons like a trainer and then use the money to buy pokeballs and potions so that he can bring about cruelty to a group of pokemon...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JES
I was trying to capture ho-oh in ORAS when all my pokemon wiped put and I noticed something that I didn't agree with. Why did I have to drop 6000 poke dollars whilst I left? This is stupid! It's not like the Ho-oh is gonna pick it up in its wings or talons like a trainer and then use the money to buy pokeballs and potions so that he can bring about cruelty to a group of pokemon...

I have the feeling there's another thread for things like these but whatever.

Maybe trainers simply don't know how to store money in objects that stop them for dropping in large quantities as they run?
 
I have the feeling there's another thread for things like these but whatever.

Maybe trainers simply don't know how to store money in objects that stop them for dropping in large quantities as they run?

I believe you are talking about this one.

I was trying to capture ho-oh in ORAS when all my pokemon wiped put and I noticed something that I didn't agree with. Why did I have to drop 6000 poke dollars whilst I left? This is stupid! It's not like the Ho-oh is gonna pick it up in its wings or talons like a trainer and then use the money to buy pokeballs and potions so that he can bring about cruelty to a group of pokemon...

You blacked out. You don't have time to make sure all your money is there when you're unconscious.
 
Back
Top