Alright, just going to nip the damn Sand Veil arguments in the bud right now. Don't you people forget I got my Poster of the Month award partially for pointing out just how ridiculous a ban on that would be.
Oh watch out, he's such a badass.
Alright, just going to nip the damn Sand Veil arguments in the bud right now. Don't you people forget I got my Poster of the Month award partially for pointing out just how ridiculous a ban on that would be.
Isn't it funny that sand veil is on 49.8 percent of Gliscors in the 1337 statistics and Gliscor is on over 15.9 percent of teams, so it is on 7.95 percent of teams, but it clearly isn't broken right? I mean you have a 5% increase in useage from regular useage to 1337 usage.
@SJCrew: The exact same thing can be said about critical hits, paralysis, confusion, etc.
Sub SD Gliscor is every bit comparable to Garchomp in terms of what it can set up on, its counters, and the number checks that disappear when the have to worry about it being under a Sub at +2 and missing. The fact that people are using this strategy to such great success on the ladder just sickens me. Regardless of what you say, facing similar garbage like this and losing a key Pokemon to a dice roll that you could not avoid is the exact opposite of fun, healthy, and competitive.
I know Acrobatics makes a world of Difference, but then why is it healthy in Gen IV? Sub/SD/EQ/SE still, while not quite as good, has all the issues that "sicken" you due to Sand Veil.
So why is it only Gen V, the Generation with many, many more checks and counters to Sand Veil mons (mainly in the form of competing weather), that Sand Veil is now a "sickening" ability? What is this double standard? Why don't we go back and Ban Sand Veil in Gen IV as well, seeing nothing has changed between the two generations in how it can be abused?
| EVs | 48.5 | 252 HP / 252 Def |
| EVs | 17.5 | 252 HP / 252 SpD |
Alright, just going to nip the damn Sand Veil arguments in the bud right now. Don't you people forget I got my Poster of the Month award partially for pointing out just how ridiculous a ban on that would be.
1/5 is not a huge chance. the vast majority of the the time, SV Gliscor just gets wasted before it can do anything, or Phazed out (and with no recovery on pretty much all SV sets, you can actually KO this Gliscor with SR damage). Defensive Pokemon wall it handily after you've taken the air gem boosted acrobatics (It's one shot then goes to being a fairly normal move remember). Anything with Ice Beam that can either outspeed or take a hit will OHKO it 80% of the time. Substitute just makes it die from residual damage faster too. Sure you CAN get terrible luck every now and again and have it miss like 4 times in a row, but you can get the same luck with missing Stone Edge, or Focus Blast, or crits, or defense drops, or any other of the gajillion things that hax in Pokemon. Sand Veil just gets singled out because it's not as common as those things are so we remember it more.
Not to mention it barely impacts the metagame at large at all. SV Gliscor is hardly ubiquitous. Sand Veil is used on all of 16% of Gliscors last month according to the lovely stats Antar has provided us with, and that amounts to a whopping 2% or so of teams using it. That's not even enough to stay OU people!
Sure, with a bit of momentum from hax it can ruin a team, but so can ANY goddamn Pokemon. How about if Haxorus crits your Skarmory and that's your only steel? How about if Alakazam scores a Sp. Def drop on your Blissey? Gliscor may get this type of hax more often, but it also needs MORE of it to be successful due to the fact that it has, y'know, two type coverage (assuming substitute) and 95 base attack. It's hardly unfair; we just get pissy whenever we get haxed out of a win, so naturally a Pokemon that wins by haxing is going to get us extra pissy.