Exeggutor is a Jinmenju a tree that grows human heads http://hyakumonogatari.com/2012/06/03/jinmenju-the-human-face-tree//
A lot of my favorite Pokemon were based(lol) off of inanimate objects or they are inanimate objects such as Magnemite, who is well, made of Magnets. Exploud, who is based off of a Boombox & Deoxys, a genetically mutated computer virus or some shit so because of that, I think Pokemon designs should NOT be limited to just animals, because when a Pokemon is based off of something not an animal, it feels more unique & unordinary rather than just a plain bird, or a plain rodent.
*Slaps head* How could I forget the Whismur family? Oh well, I'll catch them again when I do concepts next.
You can catch up on Diglett while you're at it - he's clearly based on Whac-a-Mole.
But your coverage so far has been pretty in depth. Props to you.
I'd like to point out that I am among the folks who generally appreciate the more humanoid Pokemon designs, such as Machoke, Jynx, and Toxicroak, for example. As a psychology student, I have heard some research suggesting that simulated entities that look more human offer a more comforting impression on some people than entities looking much less human.
But that's just it: virtually anything can become a Pokemon. I think the problem of appearing to run out of ideas is when it's only the one thing as the basis. Like Pachirisu is kind of just a squirrel with the typical 'electric rodent' cheeks slapped on, or Klink is just a pair of gears spinning together. But when there's more to a Pokemon's design, there's less people having a problem with it. Like the Honedge line being based around the idea of possessed/cursed swords and a coat of arms, or how both Manectric and Raikou are based on two forms of the same mythical Japanese creature. The easiest way for Game Freak to avoid the sense of 'okay, they're starting to run out of ideas' is what they did already in gen 6: just not introduce as many new Pokemon. Fewer new designs they have to come up with, the stronger what they do put out for us to enjoy when the games come out are... in general, at least. Let's face it: not all of them can be winners to everyone.Pokemon based on inanimate objects, huh.
I can see where you are coming from, but if no Pokemon are based on inanimate objects, you are shutting down a door to a large room, creativity wise.
We all know that the Gengar line is not based on animals, but they are incredibly successful. And I'm sure Metagross is popular.
However, I'd rather they not overdo it. Otherwise, everything can become a Pokemon, and it looks less creative this way, as if they are running out of ideas.
===============================
I don't see why people have to bring up humanoid Pokemon in any "Pokemon should be animals" topics, especially when people say "Pokemon should just be animals, not humans."
Humans are animals, and there's nothing you can do to change this fact. If you don't know that humans are animals, you need to revise your biology.
I have no idea why people from the English speaking world have such major problem with humanoid Pokemon. (Is it to do with education?)
Japanese people never had a thing against them. Machamp and Jynx often appears on their fan-comics. They voted vigorously for Mr. Mime and Gallade in the Pokken Tournament votes.
I must say I'm very tired of seeing people whining about humanoid Pokemon.
(I just don't know why they do. Perhaps you can try explaining to me?)
Pokemon based on inanimate objects, huh.
I can see where you are coming from, but if no Pokemon are based on inanimate objects, you are shutting down a door to a large room, creativity wise.
We all know that the Gengar line is not based on animals, but they are incredibly successful. And I'm sure Metagross is popular.
However, I'd rather they not overdo it. Otherwise, everything can become a Pokemon, and it looks less creative this way, as if they are running out of ideas.
===============================
I don't see why people have to bring up humanoid Pokemon in any "Pokemon should be animals" topics, especially when people say "Pokemon should just be animals, not humans."
Humans are animals, and there's nothing you can do to change this fact. If you don't know that humans are animals, you need to revise your biology.
I have no idea why people from the English speaking world have such major problem with humanoid Pokemon. (Is it to do with education?)
Japanese people never had a thing against them. Machamp and Jynx often appears on their fan-comics. They voted vigorously for Mr. Mime and Gallade in the Pokken Tournament votes.
I must say I'm very tired of seeing people whining about humanoid Pokemon.
(I just don't know why they do. Perhaps you can try explaining to me?)
Yeah, I've never understood why some people have such an issue with the humanoid Pokemon. If GameFreak are going to base many of the designs of Pokemon off of animals, then every animal should be eligible for consideration, which includes us. Most people are fine with this, the huge popularity of the likes of Gardevoir, Lopunny and Lucario is testament of this, but some people refuse to accept it, and I can't figure out why lol
I doubt it, but they're always going to be Pokemon's equivalent of the chicken or the egg question. Regardless, there's always going to be those designs that one way or another someone will find irksome. This wouldn't change if they only based off of animals or objects.Inanimate object 'mons are what distinguish Pokemon from Earth animals. Do note that not all inanimate object Pokemon are materialistic constructs; some are even animals!
To add to the list, Minccino is also based on a feather duster. Unown are essentially the Pokemon equivalent of Digimoji (look it up on Wikimon, the #1 Digimon wiki; just add the katakana alphabet, and you're good to go), but how were people lazy enough to not write by themselves? Did they breed glass-like materialistic constructs in the shape of letters?
The problem isn't that some designs are based on humans, but problems arise when they're based on humans repeatedly. I'm fine with an evolution line or two based on humans, but when there pop up more lines based on "humans wearing different clothes", it gets both uncreative and repetitive really fast. I mean, we have a bunch of dog-based Pokémon out there too, but at least they are based on distinctly different breeds of dogs, each with different attributes. How fun would it be with several evolution lines based off poodles, only with slight colour differences, all sold to us as "totally meant to be entirely different monsters which have nothing to do with another"? Could we accept "Here's a Poison Pokémon based on a poodle wearing a hat, and here is a Steel type based on a poodle wearing shoes" if the monsters were served to us through different games of different generations? We'd tick off the "lazy" box faster than it'd take a Smeargle-Studiogoer to make fanart of those designs. Yet we're supposed to accept "human wearing a dress", "human wearing a ball gown", "human wearing a judo suit", "bodybuilding human wearing a speedo" and "human wearing boxing equipment" time after time after time.
Also, it kind of takes the "monster" aspect out of it when the only thing separating a Pokémon from a cartoonized human is a weird nose and an unconventional skin colour. Especially bad when they're even wearing clothes for no reason (Sawk and Throh are the worst offenders in my eyes, with Jynx a close second and Hitmonchan hovering around third place). Note that I'm not against humanoid designs, but humanlike designs grind my gears a little. GameFreak have shown they can make humanoid Pokémon clearly distinguished from humans (Blaziken, Greninja, Mewtwo, Alakazam, Electivire, etc.) by tricking with proportions or poses, adding animalistic features, adding or taking away limbs or joints, or simply just slapping on a tail. It doesn't take much to make a humanlike design just humanoid. Timburr's evolution line is balancing that line well, in my eyes. Clearly based on humans, yet not humanlike to such a degree that they look like humans in a costume. Contrast Sawk, Gothitelle or Kirlia, which are so almost human that they veer on the edge of the uncanny valley.
I personally don't have a problem with Jynx, Kirlia/Gardevoir, and Gothita family. However there's just something about Sawk and Throh which breaks my immersion. I think it's that out of all the Pokemon Celever mentioned, they're the ones who its hard not to say they're wearing clothes. Now I think the Pokemon Company insists that all Pokemon who look like they're wearing clothes aren't, that's just how they're fur and body naturally looks. But still, well, let's look through them:
Hitmonchan: Hitmonlee isn't wearing anything so no problem there. Hitmonchan though looks like its wearing boxing gloves, a shirt, skirt/loose shorts, and shoes. However what helps Hitmonchan is that they're not detailed, they're solid which makes you believe they can be just skin/fur which just so happens to be colored that way. They also have colors which nicely blend with the brown. The thing stand stands out most is the boxing gloves, but being its species have evolved to use boxing and punching as way to defend themselves you can justify there hands looking like boxing gloves because they evolved to punch in the most efficient was as possible that also wouldn't hurt their hand.
Machoke/Machamp: The only oddity with them is that its said their belt is a belt. Where do wild Machop and Machoke get their belts? Who knows, maybe like Conkeldurr they know the secret of making these power belt? Anyway, it's only the belt that's odd, everything else about them in ol' natural. And also its pointed out the belt is the exception to the rule, they're not trying to pass it off as part of its body. Though that doesn't really excuse it, being its only a belt (a rather detailed belt, albeit), it's not that big of a deal.
Jynx: Now Jynx is just weird normally, so it seemingly wearing a dress actually doesn't seem that off. In addition with its mysterious nature and odd behavior which is almost human-like, I would say its suppose to have an uncanny valley-like feel but obviously failing. It evolved to look like a human as off as it sounds, it just didn't work but that won't make them stop trying.
Kirlia/Gardevoir: I always saw them as sort of elvish/ethereal beings, confirmed when they were changed to Fairy-types and that they're not in the Human-Like Egg Group but rather the Amorphous. They never looked like they were wearing clothes to me since they were designed in a way to have their colors be on parts one would think would be either clothing or skin. Kirlia's white covers its body (a dress) and its face & arms (skin). Gardevoir actually does something interesting with its white and green. Above the waist it looks like the white is the skin and the green is sort of like hair and a jacket... but below the waist the white is the dress and inside the dress is green (though its legs are also white, but we're focusing on the dress here). So in the end their color scheme blends in all over the place you can really say they're wearing clothes (at least as we know them).
Gothita family: This family is just weird to me. Like Jynx is sort of looks like they're trying to look like a person... but at the same time don't give a s*** and do their own thing. For one thing only their face (and Gothitelle's hands) are purple, everything else is covered in black with white bow-like things. Gothitelle's body is a weird accordion/stacking cup shape and not really dress-like, and do I even need to mention about its "hair".
Sawk & Throh: And now we've come to Sawk and Throh. Sawk is blue and Throh is red... but they're gi is white with patches of red including a black belt which hangs. Not only that, their gi is detailed making it look less like fur that just so happen to look like clothes. They're full on wearing clothes, heck in the anime there was a joke about that (in an episode Ash & co. along with a friendly rival named Stephan, who owns a Sawk, enter a festival. One of the challenges was to get a certain item and Stephan's item is a Black Belt... which he tries to borrows Sawk's, however Sawk isn't having any of it).
![]()
![]()
Stephan: Come on man! We need to win the competition!
Sawk: Dude, this "black belt" is attached to me!... somehow.
Tl;dr, other Pokemon who are wearing clothes either have it look like they can be a part of it or are a rare exception but it doesn't cover a lot of their body. Sawk and Throh's is covering a majority of its body and they're colored in a way that makes them feel they're not naturally part of their body.
However, I get what they were going for with their design and if they are clothes I'd rather they say they are (we don't know what materials they're made, maybe like with Conkeldurr they just know how to weave natural materials together to make their gi). But still, if they are clothes I don't see how they serve a purpose that helps them fight so they're wearing clothes of modesty sake which is a very human thing to do
Well it seems to become heavily used in Japanese fan comic strips. He resembles a perverted old man, that's why the popularity.Obesity is more of a "perversion" anyway, even in the west the vast majority of people likes slim people.
I find odd that nobody has mentioned Diggersby, which combines the elements of humans, objects and animals all in one, with animal being the most prominent nature. Will expand on this later.