The main problem with the theory is new region tends to = new generation and this would make Generation 8 very short compared to the other generations that all lasted 3-4 years in Japan, but Game Freak has broken so many patterns in the past few years I can see a game in a new region that doesn't start a new generation. The game also probably wouldn't come out until mid-November.
So:
- XY was announced January 2013 and released October 2013.
- Sun & Moon was announced February 2016 and released November 2016.
- Sword & Shield was announced February 2019 and released November 2019.
Also, remember that between XY & SM we had ORAS and between SM & SwSh we had USUM & LGPE (and Little Town Hero). But what did we have between SwSh and Gen 9? Only the DLC which probably probably took less development time than ORAS and LGPE (though probably not USUM, or at least around the same time). So I'd say GF actually had a few more months to work on Gen 9 than they had with the previous games (though even then I'd hope they take their time to polish the game, the excuses they came up for SwSh aren't going to cut it this time (they
It's a stretch and I still think Let's Go Johto or Sinnoh remakes are more likely but I just want to point this out.
Sinnoh remakes, eh, like in the beginning of Gen 8 I would have thought so but I've been worn down by counter arguments that they may be better to wait till after Gen 8 and we no longer have to deal with the Dynamax mechanic. Depending on the super mechanic in Gen 9 I would re-evaluate whether it feels like GF plan on doing Sinnoh remakes for Switch... OR they may wait till the 30th Anniversary (which would be DP's 20th) and likely Nintendo's next console (thus LGPE would be considered the Switch era Pokemon remakes).
So that leaves Let's Go Johto and, MAYBE. BIG MAYBE. But if they do it I hope they just decide to leave it at one game. It was clear with LGPE they did see it as a core series game until the backlash made them decide to backpedal it into it's one parallel series of "main" series. Because of that it doesn't need to be held to the same restrictions as the core series, one version would be good enough and I say let the be one of the Johto Starters and let them evolve like normal. "But what would they do about HMs"? If HMs are going to be an innate skill (and they still don't want to do items) I say bring back the Poke Pager, though since you can ride all Pokemon in Let's Go make it call for Poke Assists. Thinking Farfetch'd Cut, Machamp Strength, Mareep Flash, and Kingdra Whirlpool (who just clears the Whirlpool); Fly can be handled via a Pidgeot Taxi, Surf you can use the Poke Pager to get a Lapras Surf, and I just wouldn't just upgrade Lapras Surf so that it could freeze Waterfalls into a ramp it or whatever Water-type the player is riding can slide up.
One small argument I see going against the idea of releasing a new game in November is that it would interfere with the celebration events. Why would anybody talk about Kalos in May if a new region is suddenly revealed at the same time?
Because Kalos's celebration would be done by the time we get to November. Each region is only getting one month to itself and I imagine we're not going to get anything more complicated than merch based on the region, giveaway for that gen's Mythics, GO having outbreaks of Pokemon from that gen, Masters EX adding in trainers from that gen, and then blurbs & trivia on the main site talking about the region. It's not like they're gonna release SwSh DLC that lets us visit a recreation of a location from those regions, it's just a one-month-and-done thing so when we get to November we can be all focused on any new announcements.
Maybe we'll finally get Pokemon Sleep?
Eh, feels like they're sleeping on it.
Y'know what? I actually don't think it'd make sense for an old-gen remake of any kind to be the 25th anniversary game.
It's that same thought that made GF skip over Z for the 20th. For decade anniversaries I'm willing to let it go (well, not really, but I understand why for a decade anniversary they'd want something more impactful), but for the anniversaries inbetween? Let those go, if a game is release on a year ending in 1 through 9 they can be a upgraded version/remake or another kind of game.
time for the Fire Red/Leaf Green remake everyone has been clamoring for!
Ugh, the only way I'd take another Kanto remake is if it's a new story, we get to visit both Johto and the Sevii Islands, and how about letting us see what's to the north of Kanto beyond the mountain range. Heck, if they put something to the east than maybe they could make new Kanto Legendaries based on the Chinese Four Symbols.
I wrote a list of every possible alternative I could think of, but I am not going to post it here since that would be against the forum rules.
Eh, as long as it's reasonable and doesn't go too deep on the details I think you'd be fine posting your thoughts. But then again, if it is a new gen, the only thing to really talk about now would be what place in the world would it be based on. China is looking ever more likely, but I would also like a Greece/Italy region so we can get Pokemon (and maybe characters) based on the Greco-Roman Myths. Other interesting locations would be someplace in Latin America (or Central America, maybe even do something like a region which combines Mexico & Texas), Australia, Canada, Scandinavia... and then we have a bit controversial locations in the world which I'm not sure if would be comfortable to base a region on.
And there's also side games we could theorize on. Like we know New Snap is coming (and just got a new trailer) as well as Unite. But Pokemon has plenty of other old series they haven't touched in a while:
- Mystery Dungeon (still very much in the public eye thanks to the remakes of the original)
- Pokemon Ranger
- Pokemon Colosseum
- Pinball
- Hey You, Pikachu!
- PokePark
Releasing FireRed and LeafGreen again would be boring
Unless, Virtual Console releases of the Gen III games? They did Gen I & II, next would be III.