NOC Lumiose Legends Mafia - GAME OVER (Mafia Win)

Mekkah said:
Anyway deliberation over, claim incoming BUT there's a twist!

Vizh and I are masons, we can daytalk privately. One of us has passive protection over the other. The other gets +1 vote if the first one dies. I'm hiding who's who so scum has to win a coinflip if they want to take us out. If you look back at our post history with this in mind, I think it's pretty obvious. I thought of a way to (mostly) prove it with AG's help, but I need to check with Flandrs if it's allowed, since it involves the neighboring power from a previous day.
Click to expand...
Can you define passive protection? Vizh too
I may have missed this so apologies if you already said it in thread
 
Ok let's see here how do we test each role:

Vizh / Mekkah: I would need more deets on what "passive protection" but potentially best way to test this is with a vote negate aimed at one if it's with a SG.
CK: Mech has already been proven due to un-CC'ed vig - just a matter of alignment. CrreamyKitty can you remind if your vig is recharged tonight?
AG: Old role mech proven via Neon / AF claim? Impossible to test mega w/o claim obv
JALMONT: Can someone remind me where the kill ability claim came from here? Which post? I forgot. We could potentially have the kill aimed somewhere to test.
HyHy: Is this town DEATHproof or just town BPV? Gonna sound coked up since hyhy is a TR of mine but we could vote HyHy just to test this if the former.
Neon: I think neon's mech was host spewed to be verified? ImaginaryNeon even though your mega stone was stolen you should still be able to see the original PM. I'm curious what your mega ability is
charlie: Mech has been proven
marlyne: May also seem coked up but I think we can aim a vig at this?
NE: If we believe charlie then this mech is proven.
 
I think the mechsolve involves some variation of charlie aiming a vote negate at one of vizh or mekkah, if HyHy has an LPV we maybe vote that(???), Jalmont tracks prob myself while Neon targets the mason pair that charlie is hitting with the negate.
 
sunny004 said:
HyHy: Is this town DEATHproof or just town BPV? Gonna sound coked up since hyhy is a TR of mine but we could vote HyHy just to test this if the former.
Click to expand...
to clarify i am os DEATHproof. as in the first time i die i dont. i asked flandrs this includes votes so if you vote me out i dont die
i dont mind being voted to test it but that just turns tmr from lylo to mylo and loses us this vote no? i dont think its the ideal option but if ppl want it then ok
 
HydrogenHydreigon said:
to clarify i am os DEATHproof. as in the first time i die i dont. i asked flandrs this includes votes so if you vote me out i dont die
i dont mind being voted to test it but that just turns tmr from lylo to mylo and loses us this vote no? i dont think its the ideal option but if ppl want it then ok
Click to expand...
surely there is a more optimal course of action that I am just not seeing. But I will keep it open in the back of my mind
 
sunny004 said:
Ok let's see here how do we test each role:

Vizh / Mekkah: I would need more deets on what "passive protection" but potentially best way to test this is with a vote negate aimed at one if it's with a SG.
CK: Mech has already been proven due to un-CC'ed vig - just a matter of alignment. CrreamyKitty can you remind if your vig is recharged tonight?
AG: Old role mech proven via Neon / AF claim? Impossible to test mega w/o claim obv
JALMONT: Can someone remind me where the kill ability claim came from here? Which post? I forgot. We could potentially have the kill aimed somewhere to test.
HyHy: Is this town DEATHproof or just town BPV? Gonna sound coked up since hyhy is a TR of mine but we could vote HyHy just to test this if the former.
Neon: I think neon's mech was host spewed to be verified? ImaginaryNeon even though your mega stone was stolen you should still be able to see the original PM. I'm curious what your mega ability is
charlie: Mech has been proven
marlyne: May also seem coked up but I think we can aim a vig at this?
NE: If we believe charlie then this mech is proven.
Click to expand...
Ok I will keep a cursory look here if someone wants to interact before I sleep. But CrreamyKitty JALMONT Vizh / Mekkah pls see above and clarify if able
 
sunny004 said:
I think the mechsolve involves some variation of charlie aiming a vote negate at one of vizh or mekkah, if HyHy has an LPV we maybe vote that(???), Jalmont tracks prob myself while Neon targets the mason pair that charlie is hitting with the negate.
Click to expand...
Also curious for everyone's thoughts for this. I think it's a good idea if we have a plan of action going into tonight to maximize the # of mech clears
 
JALMONT said:
things I would like to see when I wake up:

1. people deciding against or for mass claim INCLUDING ACTION TARGETS
-> a. if people against mass claim, I would like to see user targets. For example: I know who CK targeted on day 1, I would like to get confirmation on who that is (and likewise prove myself!). I am also particular interested in skip/neon. we can do this without claiming
2. hear from Charlie and NE on what we should do today and generally explain why we should not vote them
3. let's try and avoid putting 3 or more votes on someone. really max should be 2 but I doubt 4 people are going to pile on a misvote

whatever happens, please do not quick hammer me for another 18 hours. thanks. gn
Click to expand...
Wait how did CK target someone d1 if not tommy?? Can you clarify point 1 here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top