It'd be good to avoid complex bans where we can in my opinion. I'd be against banning Justified bridging; Keldeo is really the only one who is particularly problematic, so it would leave the others at a distinct disadvantage. This is different to the Levitate bridging ban in that Levitate is a very widespread ability with a large number of powerful users who gained very large and highly advantageous movepools, whereas Justified has a narrow distribution, and Keldeo is the only one who gains enough to cause any consternation, so banning Justified bridging as a whole seems to me to cause a large amount of collateral damage for something that could be solved simply by banning one Pokemon. Preventing Keldeo from getting moves from others also seems to me to be unnecessarily complex, so on the whole, I'd prefer that only Keldeo was banned, since it is the sole currently uncounterable Pokemon.
. Check the list and see if we are going to have so many gamebreakers whit that new rule, i guess not, thought.
Staying true to the real games isn't the intent of Other Metagames. If Level 51 wants to apply this, he certainly can, but it sounds like a ton of work for few changes, some of which are arguably broken anyways. This metagame is complex enough, and I don't see much reason to make it any more so.
1) Pranskter Tornadus can change forme as many times as it likes and will never have Defiant.
Currently, no. We have just been discussing this, and it is of course Level 51's decision, but honestly I think it would just be unnecessarily complex, and I don't really see why it would be worth it.
Toxicroak is Keldeo's best check imo, it isn't weak to any common move and takes about 40% from Ice Beam / Thunderbolt I think, which means it can easily Dry Skin + Black Sludge + Leech Seed Stall the Keldeo and it can even Spore it if the Sleep Clause hasn't yet activated
