xJownage
Even pendulums swing both ways
Eevee, what I am saying is that it was stated multiple times that "diggersby ban makes meta fall apart" was a terrible slippery slope argument, and using the difference of such a shitty argument to say we have justifiable reason to ban Keldeo and not Diggersby is an argument completely based off of that slippery slope. What I am saying is its a pointless argument anyways.
The point I am trying to make is there aren't metagame problems atm, but a Keldeo ban could eventually turn the metagame upside down, and with you supposed logic saying that the slippery slope argument is the reason to ban this and not diggersby, this is a viable argument in that right since its the same thing. You are making it sound like slippery slope is a viable argument, but it was said that it isn't, so I am trying to point out that a Keldeo ban would have even worse side-effects than a diggersby ban.
Keldeo is nowhere near unbeatable, and the metagame is very balanced atm, so why in the world should we change it when we can beat this thing?
The point I am trying to make is there aren't metagame problems atm, but a Keldeo ban could eventually turn the metagame upside down, and with you supposed logic saying that the slippery slope argument is the reason to ban this and not diggersby, this is a viable argument in that right since its the same thing. You are making it sound like slippery slope is a viable argument, but it was said that it isn't, so I am trying to point out that a Keldeo ban would have even worse side-effects than a diggersby ban.
Keldeo is nowhere near unbeatable, and the metagame is very balanced atm, so why in the world should we change it when we can beat this thing?