GatoDelFuego
The Antimonymph of the Internet
DoneShould 'parafusion' be added as a coined term?
Something along the lines of 'a strategy attempting to prevent a foe from moving via a combination of paralysis and confusion'?
DoneShould 'parafusion' be added as a coined term?
Something along the lines of 'a strategy attempting to prevent a foe from moving via a combination of paralysis and confusion'?
doneHoopa-U?
Should, could, would.I still find it kind of odd that we refer to formes as their truncated counterpart even though the Smogdex URLs display them as, say, Shaymin-Sky and Rotom-Wash. It would make more sense if it was all consistent (if the URLs say -Wash, -Unbound, -Sky, and so on then so too should the analyses) instead of what is basically picking and choosing. I might be reading a bit into it, sure, but something as simple as consistency goes a long way.
no. They are not compound adjectives nor expanded single wordsShould terms such as double-switching and dry-switching be hyphenated?
If we're getting technical 1v1 is just colloquial slang. Even in that slang it's used as a verb (1v1 me bro). While this is probably the most minor thing ever, I don't think one needs to be 100% used over the other. As long as it's not "one on one" it should be ok.1v1 or one-on-one? I prefer 1v1 while it seems TDP prefers one-on-one; idk which one should be used.
Also sticky this please and ty
I always use one-on-one1v1 or one-on-one? I prefer 1v1 while it seems TDP prefers one-on-one; idk which one should be used.
Also sticky this please and ty
From my experience, I usually say things like "X can beat Y in a one-on-one matchup" or "X can beat Y one-on-one". I don't see a problem with 1v1 as well, but I would say "in a 1v1" is 'incorrect'. It's tricky for me to articulate this, but "one-on-one" seems to fit better into more things than "1v1". I don't see a reason to remove all "1v1"s where they can work, though.
Capitalise imo... What else could it possibly reference other than the Speed stat?Sorry, here I am again...
"Offensive teams struggle to deal with Mega Houndoom's raw power and speed." Should speed be capitalized? It's referring to speed as a noun, not specifically Mega Houndoom's Speed stat (if that makes a difference, which I'm not sure it does).
What defines its general quickness though? I'm still not sure what I think about this. Flavor-wise, it's sleek and stuff, but that doesn't apply in a competitive article. All I can think of apart from its Speed stat is its access to Sucker Punch and the speed with which it can set up and sweep. Is it the latter you're thinking of?It's referencing its general quickness, not its hard Speed stat, it doesn't need to be capitalized.
It's not referencing any particular Speed stat that it possesses, it's fast whether it's running Modest or Timid or any amount of EVs or whatever else. Its inherent speed is high, not necessarily referring to its Speed.What defines its general quickness though? I'm still not sure what I think about this. Flavor-wise, it's sleek and stuff, but that doesn't apply in a competitive article. All I can think of apart from its Speed stat is its access to Sucker Punch and the speed with which it can set up and sweep. Is it the latter you're thinking of?
It's grammatically a singular (the writer is referring to the "concept" Thundurus), so you should add it. Similarly to how you'd say "Thundurus has great offensive stats" as opposed to "Thundurus have great offensive stats," you should add the s here."Thundurus'(s) Prankster gives its status moves priority."
"Heatran covers Thundurus'(s) weaknesses quite nicely."
Do I add the s at the end? It's really unclear as to whether the writer is referring to all Thundurus or a single Thundurus.