brightobject [NO]
sunny004 [YES]
ButteredToast [YES]
Pidge [NO]
Walrein [NO]
Leethoof [NO]
Izhuark [NO]
PokeguyNXB [NO]
More Cowbell [NO]
I just want to say that Walrein's proposal would be pretty disastrous for the game. Should his be allowed to pass, we would be end up voting on each others proposals based on who is winning/losing and less so based on the quality of the proposal. This is a bad practice and would only end up creating politics situations in which players align themselves with a group to pass their legislation and to obtain points because there is a disincentive towards voting.
I proposed a points system a few turns ago that would award points based on quality of play determined subjectively by impartial hosts to shy away from this type of points system. I'm not saying that it is the answer, but it would be better for this game as a whole to not directly assign points based on the passing of proposals or by vote counts. I'd rather have a fair game than a popularity contest...
sunny004 [YES]
ButteredToast [YES]
Pidge [NO]
Walrein [NO]
Leethoof [NO]
Izhuark [NO]
PokeguyNXB [NO]
More Cowbell [NO]
I just want to say that Walrein's proposal would be pretty disastrous for the game. Should his be allowed to pass, we would be end up voting on each others proposals based on who is winning/losing and less so based on the quality of the proposal. This is a bad practice and would only end up creating politics situations in which players align themselves with a group to pass their legislation and to obtain points because there is a disincentive towards voting.
I proposed a points system a few turns ago that would award points based on quality of play determined subjectively by impartial hosts to shy away from this type of points system. I'm not saying that it is the answer, but it would be better for this game as a whole to not directly assign points based on the passing of proposals or by vote counts. I'd rather have a fair game than a popularity contest...