im just going to analyze both of you since #159 onwards. so 159 is obviously you calling him out, etc, etc. then, celevers first response is already suspicious imo. he basically says "sorry spiffy cant answer", then throws in "barty is vigilante". this obviously is going to divert attention from his lack of answers, and it worked well. then celever is back on in post 179 and sort of explains his vigilante assumption (not well, but celever is pretty damn noob and his answer was more stupid than anything else imo). then he adds a bunch of fluff asking barty what his ability was and telling me why we didnt need a vote. which contributes nothing. at all. then celever promises spiffy answers yay! rofl then right after celever posts about barty tunneling us
when he is the main culprit. so not really helping the village. unvoting spiffy under some flimsy stuff and tries to avoid questions. then doesnt even put his money where his mouth is when he does put l-1 on barty until me and ms put some slight pressure on him. after than tunnels barty some more. then spiffy comes in and starts whining about putting a pr claim at l-1 and honestly i think thats a bit scummy. if mafia hammers then we might lose a power role but we get a basically confirmed lynch d2, and losing a noob pr isnt the end of the world. celever comes in with another signature one line answer.
now then spiffy comes up with a very scummy post #198. im going to post a couple of the sentences i found strange.
Anyway, this barty lynch has been handled very poorly. I understand that it is mostly his fault for being so vague about his role, but a lot of us have tunneled barty so hard that there exists pretty much no other lynch option. What happens when he claims? Everyone will unvote and we'll be back to square one.
this is what stood out to me the most. he claims and yes we all unvote. but square 1? hell no! we get a claim to analyze, tons of posts about barty to analyze, etc etc. we have an UNLIMITED DEADLINE. An experienced player like you of all people should know that. in addition, having 2 votes on 6 players will not even be close to the pressure of 6 votes on one player. however you did a good job of recognizing and attempting to stop tunneling, so im not going to say that excerpt was super scummy or anything, but it set off a couple of bells.
bullying someone to vote for someone else doesn't sit well with me and doesn't seem village-motivated.
rofl is bullying saying "there is no risk at putting him at l-1"? because that seems like quite an exaggeration. then again this is probably just OMGUS, but please it was not close to bullying.
damn 1 page down
page 5: spiffy again is a tad scummy #205. just because you think someone is probably vanillager doesnt mean you shouldnt stop putting pressure on them... again an experienced player should mean a d1 vote does not mean you want them to lynch... celever does a couple more posts (re: barty), but they dont have much content as usual, bringing up items is kind of distracting but somewhat productive i guess (just a sidenote my role references something i will assume are items but doesnt give much info at all). spiffy posts again, but its just "celever answer me". i get that you want him to answer but in the meantime
you arent helping the village. beyond a couple paragraph length posts you dont contribute anything to the village this page. rofl celever does a couple more 1-liners about barty, not helping at all. then answers woodchuck in a very cop-out answer (im indecisive!!!!). seems like a scum answer... then celever bitches at barty some more. spiffy still hasnt posted much and goes "i agree w/jalmont", which seems lazy.
page 6 is boring but spiffy just bitches and celever bitches.
here are condensed reads of you two and your interactions:
celever: you have definitely had time. you post at pretty much all the times of the day. if you spend 10 minutes a question for spiffy thats less than an hour, and you obviously have spent at least an hour posting itt (though your posts dont really reflect that tbh). your refusal to answer spiffy is worrying and i have to think thats scummy. on your obsession with barty i dont have as much of a problem, unlimited deadlines mean that sort of behavior is pretty acceptable and i have to agree with your reads (except the jalmont barty me thing, still makes no sense tbh)
spiffy: i know you want celever to answer your questions. that doesnt mean you dont have to stop helping the village. in addition you dont really talk much about the main topic, barty, except to complain about him being l-1 which because im reading barty as scum is suspicious, but i mean you have been contributing some. overall im going to read slightly scum but that could easily change. also the fact this is the second time you have tagged me and other people to whine about celever not answering is a little offputting but it was like 3 days ago so im probably just reading too far into this lol