Almost every example of a Pokemon getting a 4 on a survey is right after releases and the Pokemon was quickbanned.Point out to me an example, this gen, of a mon getting over a 4 on a survey and getting above 70% (let alone 90%) on a suspect and it "making sense". You have no foundation to make the below claim especially when multiple high level players mentioned that they were voting ban not because of GF but because of the state of the meta and banning it was a step in the right direction
There was a clear focus on Gouging Fire being a broken Pokemon in the metagame. Metagame scores on the survey were not dramatically higher or lower. The numbers do not even support what you are saying, but you conveniently ignored that part of the survey curiously.
The funny thing is I literally agreed that we are likely to act aggressively and yet you still are playing this bizarre spin-zone game for some unknown reason. Give it a break. A ban happened. More tiering action is going to happen. Not everything needs to be an attack.