No. Because your item is so much more powerful that it is something of a game-breaker. And there is some, shall we say, OVERLAP between them, which I also doubt would happen.
I was hoping to get reactions from Woodchuck and Blackhawk11 to use to judge their scumminess, but Houndoomsday and Blackhawk11's and Woodchuck's intelligence essentially broke that attempt. My other statements in this post were completely legitimate and reasoned through (not bullshit).Zyphirex said:Sorry for not being up-to-date on all 500 posts yet. I would just like to inquire from Metal Sonic about his motivations for voting for me. I am just wondering how lynching me would benefit you and the "greater good." I am not fully through the posts up to this point, so I will withhold any uninformed (and possibly incriminating) analysis of the players. I will say that from what I have seen so far, the interaction between Celever and Spiffy looks quite suspicious. Among other news, there is an obvious connection between Blackhawk11 and Woodchuck that everyone seems to be missing, so I'm going to Vote Woodchuck until he explains himself and his interactions with Blackhawk11.
This was hoping for a reaction to buddying from people and possibly a reaction from Snaquaza. This also failed because it was largely ignored and only garnered a few responses.Zyphirex said:Oh yes, I suppose I have to Unvote Snaquaza. I have no problem with this because his play screams villager to me. Besides, Snaquaza has been extremely helpful to the village.
This was just continuing my attempt at pressuring Woodchuck, and throwing out a vague explanation for the Snaquaza bullshit while hoping for some more reactions. I legitimately thought that Houndoomsday seemed scummy.Zyphirex said:In response to your first question, I will let Woodchuck explain his connection and interactions with BlackHawk11. In the likely case that he plays dumb, I will spell it out for the common folk. I don't want possible scum having any extra information to play off of. On a digression, you seem to comment on many posts directed at other players. I have noted this in my analysis that I will be posting later. Perhaps you are trying to direct your scum buddies like a puppet master, making them bounce and sway on your concealed strings.
In response to your second question, the sub-tones of Snaquaza's posts make it obvious that he is a villager. While a bit lazy, his posts show that he has the intention to try to eek out some important reads as if that is his only way of being useful. From that, I will even go as far as to say he is probably a vanillager. He has been quite helpful in inciting some responses from players that give valuable information for reading.
The only bullshit in here is that I didn't have any evidence on Woodchuck. Everything else was legitimate.Zyphirex said:It must be really hard to keep your cool right now, facing intense scum accusations. I would panic too if my mafia teammates and I were called out with tough to beat claims. Luckily, the claims being leveled against you are totally unfounded and random, which is why you are so calm. Oh? You are panicking? Maybe, the claims really do have a basis, and you realize that basis. Unfortunately, I, once again, have to sleep. Expect fully verified and clarified claims tomorrow backed with "postual evidence." In fact, I am so confident in my claims that I will Unlynch Woodchuck and Lynch Houndoomsday to apply the starting pressure to get the scum talking (I will have evidence on Woodchuck, too, but I'm going to apply the most pressure at the weakest link). I suggest that all scum quickly bandwagon and hammer me before I get back tomorrow.
This is called a joke. If you don't know what the word "joke" means, look it up in a dictionary. If you don't get the joke, it's supposed to be funny because Eagle4 is the host of this game. I was just trying to have a little laugh. Aren't we playing mafia to have fun? Feel free to analyze this as an important part of all of your decisions for the rest of the game. If you didn't think my joke was funny, sux 4 u.Zyphirex said:Eagle4 has been acting pretty suspicious, just giving vote count posts and warnings. That behavior seems pretty scummy to me...
Paperblade said:I'm townie as fuck
No. Experienced players do care if they get lynched but they show it differently. Basically I would expect a more experienced players to play nearly the same when they are on the chopping block while I there probably is a noticeable difference in behavior between a beginner mafia and a beginner town.I suppose I should get something straight right now. Jalmont said that many beginning players care about getting lynched. Does this mean that experienced players don't care if they get lynched? This seems a bit counter-intuitive, since in my experience, if you die, you lose, and you only act completely out of self-interest if you feel that you are going to lose anyways.